FINANCIAL SERVICES: Harness your supply base to power your business

Driving more value from the supply market is a board level agenda item for Financial Services organizations around the world.

Discover how to effectively manage your supply base to deliver value to your business - above just cutting costs.

Click here to access our new Financial Services resource portal

Subscribe to our monthly e-newsletter

Connect with us

Subscribe to our RSS Feed

Your email:

Proxima Blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Global myths of procurement outsourcing - Myth 3: PO damages stakeholder relationships

  
  
  
  
John Mathew Client Services Director

Successful procurement outsourcing hinges on a provider’s ability to successfully engage with stakeholders.  You can have the world’s best sourcing engine, but it’s nothing if it doesn’t engage well with the business, and deliver what the business needs. 

To us, successful business partnering is the most critical element of our work.  Put simply, it is at the very heart of successful procurement outsourcing.  A quality procurement outsourcer knows this, invests in it, and places great importance on getting it right.

In fact, getting this wrong is the reason why internal procurement functions in some organizations are under performing – and why using an outsourcing model can offer a better service.  

Procurement outsourcing enables greater attention and focus to go on business partnering, as it allows division of labor and specialization.  One issue we see with a fixed internal team is that individuals tend to manage a sourcing project from end to end – from understanding the business need, to writing tenders, managing the sourcing process, analyzing responses, etc.  However, there’s only so much one person can be capable of, or do at any one time.   Engaging and influencing a stakeholder requires a very different skillset to negotiating with a vendor.  

This is where an outsourcing model comes into its own.  It enables specialists to be used for each task.  So a business minded, commercially astute, communicator with excellent consulting skills will take on the business partnering role.  They will ‘front’ the process.  They then have vast support bubbling through from the rest of the business.  Support such as:

  • Analysts that understand the data, know how to manipulate it, and get insight from it

  • Deep category experts – and expertise that is up to date (as opposed to any in-house with expertise that is two-years out of date as the category has been looked at since it was last tendered)

  • Knowledge of what other organizations are doing

  • Negotiators

  • Market researchers

  • Appropriate technology

  • Legal counsel

  • Etc.

All of this means that you get a higher quality of service, at a much quicker pace, than a single internal person is able to achieve.  Furthermore, peaks and troughs in demand can be easily dealt with.

The truth is (and this is a surprise to many) it’s often easier for an external person to catalyze change than it is for an internal person.

Specialization allows an outsourcer to invest in business partners that are of sufficient caliber and capability to engage with stakeholders as peers.  They are able to challenge long held beliefs, business rules, ways of working, and approaches to technology, etc.  They then bring to the table the combined knowledge and experiences of the outsourcing business of what has worked well in other clients, what developments are happening in the supply base, what innovation is going on, etc.  And then they work with the stakeholders and the wider business to help drive change - and ultimately change behaviors.

As a result, the stakeholders receive a better, faster and more business orientated service than they do from an in-house team.

The truth: Any quality  provider of procurement outsourcing will invest heavily in business partnering.  As a result, the service received by the business goes up.  In turn, people will seek out procurement, when previously they did whatever they could to get around it.  And that’s because it becomes easier, faster, more insightful and better value for money with procurement’s involvement.

Now that we’ve covered the stakeholder relationship concerns, in the next post I’ll dispel the myths that some people hold in the areas of overall control and business risk...

Click here to access the previous posts: Myth 1 - ROI comes from cost reductions and Myth 2: The ROI from procurement outsourcing is insufficient

Comments

We only outsource the activity,but not our responsibility. 
 
So I feel it doesn't spoil the relationship  
Posted @ Friday, November 30, 2012 8:21 AM by Atul Baru
It will be interesting to hear people from the groups thoughts on this question. 
 
In my own opinion I can see pro's and cons of outsourcing any element of business. 
 
The article gives a very good case for outsourcing procurement, however, like everything this is only one side of the story. Outsourcing can work but it does come at a price and the price needs to be weighed up before adopting. 
 
Outsourcing in my opinion needs careful monitoring and relies on stakeholder engagement to ensure success. My concern with outsourcing is that when no longer internal to the business, focus on core roles and responsibilities can be lost dependant on the stakeholder involvement. The company can appear disjointed. Instead of a whole it is broken into different segments with resulting breakdown of communication.  
 
Outsourcing causes one big problem in my opinion..Communication. The communication loop is broken. When it is an internal process people can openly discuss areas of work. External to the business results in a closing of ranks and barriers are formed which can result in communication issues.
Posted @ Friday, November 30, 2012 8:23 AM by Nancy McAllister
Nancy - you make a great point, and for outsourcing in general I would agree with you. However, procurement outsourcing in Proxima is different.  
 
The feedback we get from stakeholders, suppliers and the C-suite is that we dramatically improve communication. And that's because we focus heavily on the business partnering piece (as the blog post aims to lay out).
Posted @ Friday, November 30, 2012 10:47 AM by John Mathew
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics