FINANCIAL SERVICES: Harness your supply base to power your business

Driving more value from the supply market is a board level agenda item for Financial Services organizations around the world.

Discover how to effectively manage your supply base to deliver value to your business - above just cutting costs.

Click here to access our new Financial Services resource portal

Subscribe to our monthly e-newsletter

Connect with us

Subscribe to our RSS Feed

Your email:

Proxima Blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Sector Spotlight: Energy (pt 1) – the rise and rise of an industry

  
  
  
  
Guy Strafford - Proxima

In response to a new Ofgem report, warning that the high level of spare capacity in the UK electricity market is “set to end quite rapidly over the next few years”, UK Energy providers have begun to hike their prices, spurring the UK governments interest around Energy conservation.

The Ofgem report shows that spare electricity margins might fall from the current 14 percent average today to just 4 percent by 2015/16, increasing the uncertainty surrounding wholesale fuel prices and leading to potential blackouts for some boroughs by 2015.

Led by four of the Britain’s largest energy companies in the recent weeks, these above-inflation winter increases in gas and electricity prices will add between £80 and £110 to the typical annual household bill.

British Prime Minister, David Cameron, has told MPs during a recent Prime Minister's Questions that he will ‘tackle the problem’, announcing that “we [UK Government] will be legislating so that energy companies have to give the lowest tariff to their customers". However, the UK government is still backing investment new energy generation - primarily coal driven (given the lack of alternative investment uptick into gas) – resulting in the UK inevitably missing its carbon targets.

The rise of the (green) machines

On the other side of the proverbial Energy coin, as the race to ensure sustainable energy supply continues, Moody’s (the rating agency) has recently reported that renewable energy sources such as wind and solar are “having a profound negative impact on Europe’s gas and coal generators”. The FT has recently reported that renewable energy accounts for “more than a third of Europe’s total installed capacity base, a proportion set to rise to 50 per cent by 2020”.

Overall due to the low marginal costs associated with wind and solar power generation sources, providers of these renewable energies will quickly disrupt traditional energy providers and ultimately push down prices for the consumer.

Early movers towards renewable energies, such as E.ON, have invested upwards of €8bn, increasing its renewable capacity tenfold since 2007 resulting in a “Massive” contribution to overall company earnings.

Although the Big Six energy firms have told industry analysts they are “squeezing competition”, why aren't we seeing basic economic principals being applied i.e. in a competitive marketplace, more competition usually results in lower prices for the consumer – so why are we seeing the opposite?

Perhaps an effective oligopoly is forming, which the regulators need to address with stiff action. One hope this brings is that it will drive forward investment into sources of renewable energy – but that’s not going to have any effect in the short to medium term.

 


Additional Sources

The £10 billion profit opportunity - presentation of research findings

 

webinar pic website

Our latest research reveals that businesses spend, on average, two-thirds of their revenue on non-labor costs – 68.3% in 2011. This far outstrips their collective labor costs, which averaged just 12.9% of their revenue. Yet headcount reduction is traditionally seen as the best way to tackle cost. This raises a number of questions:

  • Are businesses ensuring that their non-labor cost base is being effectively managed?
  • If not, why not?
  • And what are the potential benefits of making that investment?

Click here to download the £10 billion profit opportunity whitepaper

Watch the webinar recording here


Comments

Because in many places and because of R&D costs, energy companies have a monopoly--at least in the US--especially when you're working in the consumer energy space. So they don't have to be forward looking or innovative. So the key is to remove that monopoly or to find ways to work around it.
Posted @ Monday, November 12, 2012 10:36 AM by Chipo Nyambuya
In the UK, this is starting to change ever so slowly as community energy companies start to emerge and take hold of their generation. One of the biggest barriers to large scale wind turbines is the perceived ugliness of the structures - if the turbines are owned by the communities who are looking at them, the impact is dramatically different. 
 
On a larger scale, the City of Stoke have a NESTA-funded project to become energy independent, with one big benefit being that they stay in charge of their energy prices - on which the 10,000 people working in the potteries' jobs depend.
Posted @ Monday, November 12, 2012 10:40 AM by Andy Middleton
Considering how long it takes to plan, approve and build any kind of electrical power apparatus (generation, transmission, or distribution, it really doesn't matter), "true" market forces will first cause prices to spike up until new projects can be built. 
 
We are talking years or even decades until new projects become operational. Then, are we really convinced that these "market" rules will remain in place long enough to justify the investment? In other words, do you believe that the "free market" policy will be sustained by our politicians, for years and years, despite any backlash from the population regarding increasing prices for electricity?  
 
So, Mr. Azimi, how many new projects in the Energy Sector you (or you company) are starting, right now, with such clear indication of insufficient power supply (and thus higher prices, thus a clear incentive for investment)?  
 
I suggest you compare the investment in the Energy Sector, particularly the Electricity infrastructure, and compare this investment with the GDP. That idea of "too big to fail", often applied to financial institutions, should also be applied here once you realize how much capital (human and that other kind that markets value the most) have been applied to get the existing infrastructure.  
Posted @ Monday, November 12, 2012 10:51 AM by Leonardo Lima
Although studies have shown that nuclear energy is one of the most cost-effective sources of electricity on a lifetime cost basis, the scale of investment in an individual nuclear power plant, and hence the period required to make a return on investment, is generally much larger than for other types of generating plant. This creates particular problems for those seeking to finance investment in new nuclear plants, driving up the financing costs compared to fossil-fuelled generating capacity. This is especially true where such investment is to be made principally by the private sector and where competitive electricity markets exist. At least in the early stages of nuclear expansion, some form of government support for financing costs may thus be required in some cases.
Posted @ Tuesday, November 20, 2012 6:29 AM by Florian Glodeanu
Yes its true
Posted @ Tuesday, November 20, 2012 6:32 AM by Rohit Singh
Comments have been closed for this article.