FINANCIAL SERVICES: Harness your supply base to power your business

Driving more value from the supply market is a board level agenda item for Financial Services organizations around the world.

Discover how to effectively manage your supply base to deliver value to your business - above just cutting costs.

Click here to access our new Financial Services resource portal

Subscribe to our monthly e-newsletter

Connect with us

Subscribe to our RSS Feed

Your email:

Proxima Blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Redefining Procurement Series: Procurement Outsourcing (Part 2) – Why Outsource Procurement?

  
  
  
  
Chris Gayner - Proxima

Our previous post in the Redefining Procurement Series offered a brief overview of successful Procurement Outsourcing and how it differs from the traditional BPO we have grown to know. This post looks at the fundamental question of why outsource procurement at all?

Organisations with a clear definition of Direct Procurement (also referred to as Goods for Resale, Primary Procurement, Common Goods etc) have spent decades engineering their primary supply chain – ensuring:

  • GFR margin is at or above industry standard
  • Risk is kept to a minimum
  • Long term supply has been assured with preferred suppliers
  • Relationships have been built and developed over time
  • Processes have been engrained into the core business
  • Senior executives and Board members acknowledge the value of the supply chain in light of business objectives.

Indirect Procurement (also called Goods Not for Resale, Non-Core or Non Common Procurement or a term which is becoming increasing used - Enabling Spend), on the other hand, has slipped down a long list of senior executive’s priorities as its strategic value at Board level is questioned.

A FTSE 100 beer brewer based in Europe, during a recent interview, advised that 90% of the procurement team’s time is focused on the direct supply market with minimal attention given to indirects – with majority of this expenditure residing within the individual business units, dispersed across Europe, who have “no incentive to buy better when looking at their individual list of priorities”.

This brings up the question, can’t you apply all the experiences and learnings from Direct Procurement to Indirect expenditure?

The answer is simply, NO!

 

The difference between Direct and Indirect Procurement

 

Why GNFR procurement needs a different approach within Retail
(Click the image to enlarge)

As you can see from the above chart, there are fundamental differences in how this aspect of expenditure is managed:

  • Within the indirect supply market there are hundreds of categories, all of which require deep knowledge to procure effectively. Also, there are tens of thousands of suppliers, all who invest heavily in selling to you (the buyer) – for large contracts it is not unusual for a supplier’s account management team to be larger than the entire Procurement function it is selling to.
  • Given the relatively high turnover of indirects, it’s not uncommon to see large numbers of low £ value transactions being carried out, frequently
  • There are thousands of stakeholders (internal and external), all with knowledge about their area but need Procurement’s support. This is turn means that Procurement must act as an internal advisor, influencing functional decision makers and budget holders about their spend
  • Indirect procurement professionals do not actually have any mandate over internal stakeholder’s budgets.

Overall, managing Indirect expenditure effectively requires a huge variety of skillsets.  Skillsets such as:

  • A broad range of category expertise
  • Change management
  • Influencing, engaging and advising various stakeholders across the business (from senior executives down)
  • Facilitation, negotiation and supplier management
  • Data analysis (turning raw data into business insights and intelligence)
  • Technological know-how – and so the list goes on.

To make matters even more challenging, the demands on a business, and the skill sets required to effectively management indirects, change from one week to the next. 

The odds therefore are heavily stacked against any procurement function looking to centralize and consolidate Indirects (in the same way as Directs) or in fact even being able to consistently meet an organisation’s growing needs.

So… What are your options?

 

Enhancing & redefining the role of indirect procurement - research findings and results (whitepaper and webinar series)

Why businesses struggle with indirect procurement

Register your details to access the complete Redefining Procurement Series including a 60 minute webinar, three research-led whitepapers and a series of thought pieces covering:

  • Current perceptions of the indirect procurement function and its desired future role within the organization
  • The business value that can be derived through better managed indirect procurement
  • Why businesses struggle with delivering indirect procurement effectively
  • The role of procurement outsourcing in enabling the indirect procurement function to take on a business partner role within the organisation.

Click here to access the complete series

 

Comments

From my experience there are a few fundamental questions of which "why" is typically the first and sometimes only one considered. More importantly I would urge the organisation to spend time considering the "how" more than the "why". 
 
How will the outsource program impact or complement the culture of my organisation, especially in year one?  
 
How will I engage the impacted budget holders and people who will determine success to be aligned on the rationale for this?  
 
How will we properly program and change manage this?  
 
How will we set up effective governance to ensure it keeps delivering every year?  
 
I suggest that spending far more time in the "how" rather than the "why" will help organisations avoid many of the reasons why such ventures fail to deliver to aspirations and better support both parties to be successful.
Posted @ Thursday, November 03, 2011 4:45 AM by Andrew Brightmore
My experience suggests that why and how are interlinked. Once "why" is determined, then the how should be defined around that. The implementation is important, but outsourcing when done correctly has a couple for key drivers. Usually the headline reason for outsourcing is the cost. There is less cost to outsource a solution. This is not always easily visible on face value. For example, where an organisation has been sweating its infrastructure, cost is minimal. However the upgrade costs to move it to a contemporary solution can be cost prohibitive without outsourcing, where cost is displaced over a number of years. Additionally, many companies are not well placed to understand or leverage the market. Outsourcing enables an organisation to make someone else think about what are the best alternatives for services to your organisation and utilise their potentially bigger market power to gain the organisation better value. 
 
I have to agree though, that there is not always sufficient consideration to how the solution is implemented, reducing the value of the potential benefits.
Posted @ Thursday, November 03, 2011 4:53 AM by AJ Karliner
I don’t believe you can take a generalised view on this as in some cases it would make sense and in others it wouldn’t. There is certainly a case in many areas of the public sector for procurement to be outsourced as based on some of the well publicised disasters there is a serious skills gap, as procurement is generally regarded as a process and devoid of commercial expertise. EU regs has a lot to answer for in creating this situation and injecting commercial competence into the process isn’t going to happen overnight. There is also a naïve belief that all outsourcing results in an improvement in service and reduces costs. It is an expensive mistake when two years after the event you realise it hasn’t produced the expected results. On the other hand when working in the private sector, the pressures on achieving the best outcomes cannot be higher where you are directly employed and procurement decisions impact directly on your employer and colleagues.
Posted @ Thursday, November 03, 2011 4:55 AM by Trevor Black
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics