FINANCIAL SERVICES: Harness your supply base to power your business

Driving more value from the supply market is a board level agenda item for Financial Services organizations around the world.

Discover how to effectively manage your supply base to deliver value to your business - above just cutting costs.

Click here to access our new Financial Services resource portal

Subscribe to our monthly e-newsletter

Connect with us

Subscribe to our RSS Feed

Your email:

Proxima Blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Turning the Traditional BPO Model on its Head

  
  
  
  
Guy Strafford - Proxima

A lesson in customer experience and the rise of near-shoring

One of our clients has recently pulled their AP help desk from India and moved it to Cwmbran Wales in light of diminishing customer experience.

The AP operation was initially split into two distinct operations:

  • Customer Contact
  • Processing

These two operations were not only operationally split, but also physically split (geographically) across two delivery centers. Quite often, the Customer Contact team were unaware of the technicalities and day-to-day activities of the Processing Team and vice versa – which meant each of the teams’ ability to respond on the other’s behalf was significantly reduced. In order to overcome this information gap, detailed templates and customer paths were developed to enable the Customer Contact team to handle the calls and emails coming in.

The result, more often than not, was:

  • Customers been fed answers that did not answer their questions
  • Service was often considered robotic
  • Customers and suppliers boycotting the service completely.

The lack of autonomy in handling customer enquiries ultimately resulted in the entire operation being re-engineered and the decision was made to move the entire operation from India to the UK.

The shift to the UK was done in segments, ensuring the team based in Wales were not overloaded initially before moving across more activities one at a time. The re-engineering began in March 2011, and within one month of setup the response was very positive, with a senior manager commenting:

I am really pleased that our team are performing so well and that the business has noticed a step change in the service they receive.  We will be working closely over the coming weeks to start to identify process improvements and enhance the overall AP information we are receiving”.

Over the past 4 months we have seen:

  • Overall response time increasing dramatically with calls being handled much more naturally (i.e. no longer template driven answers)
  • A much more human service – less robotic
  • Those who previously boycotted the service are now much happier and increasingly using the service.

Customer experience as a competitive advantage

In fitting with the above story, Lloyds, Santander and United Utilities have all moved large portions (or in Santander’s case, all) of their call center operations away from India and back to the UK with the primary driver being customer service levels.

According to a recent FT article Santander “suffered the ignominy of being branded Britain’s most complained-about bank”. During a time where consumer confidence is at an all time low (yet customer demands, needs and expectations seem to continually increase) customer service can be a very important factor in whether customers chose to stay or move to the nearest low cost option.

The traditional BPO ‘lift-and-shift to low labour cost countries’ methodology is entering a new era, in which a greater focus is being placed on effectiveness rather than purely efficiency (doing things better not faster). Ensuring a consistently high level of customer service may cost slightly more to keep the customer happy, but it’s a lot more cost effective than attracting a new customer in place of each one you have just lost due to a poor customer experience.

In addition to the above, what other functions do you think organisations will look to bring near or on-shore over the next 12 months (and why)?

Comments

Interesting piece. Questions: Why couldn't the Indian outsourced provider(s)adapt to the shortcomings of the services? What was the incremental +/- in percentage costs of bringing the business back? Is there a monetary measurement that can be associated with the improved service?  
 
I understand you often cannot put a price on "good will" and client satisfaction, but what was the economic aspects of the changes that took place?
Posted @ Friday, July 29, 2011 1:39 PM by Ted Weyn
This is not uncommon, however why did these companies move to off shore call centres in the first place if customer service was a priority?  
There are alternatives to India such as South Africa which is very British, speaks English as a first language and opperates call centres to best practise standards. What must be recognised is that often the BPO company has the odds stacked against them when they are expected to reduce costs and improve standards for a service that was either not managed before of was never delivered to high standards. This said UK comapanies are chosing the middle ground to run their own call centres off-shore and rely on BPO consultants to make it work to high and exacting standards and processes.
Posted @ Tuesday, August 02, 2011 7:32 AM by Steve
Thanks Ted - good questions. The Indian outsourced provider couldn't adapt purely and simply because their operating model meant they can't. Their approach is to turn the service into a process, almost codify it, and then instruct operatives to follow the prescriptive process. As a result, when you call the helpdesk you are dealing with a person following a predefined process map with no judgment made on their part. If a request goes outside the process, problems start occurring. 
 
What we offer is a much more personalised service. When you call the helpdesk you are dealing with a person who is listening to your request and deciding themselves how to deal with it. They have a level of empowerment. Often it’s the same person, who you get to know and they get to know you. You can build a relationship of sorts, enabled by being in the same culture. 
 
From an economic perspective, its about value for money, not cost. You can always get cheaper - but are you getting what you need as a business? The overall cost increased by c.25%. But its not a straight forward like-for-like comparison, as the service provided is expanded beyond what was being delivered before. And as you say, you can't put a price of client satisfaction.
Posted @ Wednesday, August 03, 2011 12:50 PM by Guy Strafford
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics