FINANCIAL SERVICES: Harness your supply base to power your business

Driving more value from the supply market is a board level agenda item for Financial Services organizations around the world.

Discover how to effectively manage your supply base to deliver value to your business - above just cutting costs.

Click here to access our new Financial Services resource portal

Subscribe to our monthly e-newsletter

Connect with us

Subscribe to our RSS Feed

Your email:

Proxima Blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Redefining Procurement Series: Stakeholder Communication (Part 1)

  
  
  
  
Chris Gayner - Proxima

My last post in the Redefining Procurement Series finished by stating that the key to being a great leader is understanding your stakeholders needs and drivers and adapting your approach and metrics to their unique needs.

With this established, we now need to understand how procurement can (and should) engage with the various departmental stakeholders and forge close working relations.

Procurement as a communications hub

Procurement as a business hub - communication with stakeholders

(Click image to enlarge)

The above figure shows the interconnectedness of procurement within an organisation, highlighting internal and external touch points. Each of these touch points has a different definition of success (e.g. benchmarks, and dashboards), a different set of operating characteristics (e.g. dynamic and flexible vs process driven) and most importantly different people with different experience, expertise and expectations.

Forging close ties with any department requires procurement to understand these various facets of their internal customers and rather than dictate terms or processes, procurement should instead take on an advisory role within the organisation – sharing knowledge, insight and expertise with the rest of the business to improve performance, processes, operations and therefore how to procure not just better but smarter.

The first step towards becoming an advisor is speaking your customers’ language. We are not talking about learning a foreign language in the traditional sense, we are simply saying tailor your message to what your customer (or stakeholder) wants to hear/read:

  • CEO - Risk, shareholder value, growth
  • CFO - P&L, cash flow, control, visibility, business performance
  • COO – Efficiency, processes, resource allocation, planning
  • Departmental Heads – Spec match, value for money, delivery, effectiveness
  • Front of House / Shop Floor - Delivery times, stock levels, returns, faults
  • Suppliers - Forecasts, new specs

Andrew Collopy, Global Procurement Director, Downstream at British Petroleum (BP) during a recent interview* attributes a big part of the success he and his team has seen in terms of engaging back with the business as a result of “beginning to speak the language of the business and more specifically speaking finance’s language”.

However, Andrew advises it’s hard work maintaining such a high level of internal management and as such a challenge that has arisen is “how much time to spend on this internal validation piece – not distracting our good procurement people away from their time in the supply base.”

What are some of your key challenges inhibiting better internal communication within your organisation?

Comments

As a financier I am aware that many business professionals have an information gap regarding acquisition financing (whether real estate or equipment acquisitions). Especially with large corporations, acquiring equipment through a first amendment lease can have significant tax advantages and, therefore, significant cost savings to the corporation. Companies often do not finance acquisitions because they "have to". In fact many companies finance acquisitions as part of their strategic plan for tax reduction or capital conservation.  
 
 
 
It seems to me that having procurement closely communicating with the CFO provides a vehicle by which the company, as a whole, can retain more earnings. And isn't this, after all, the primary goal of business?
Posted @ Tuesday, June 07, 2011 9:17 AM by Craig Buehler
This is an interesting model, in theory.  
 
But how often do we actually see Procurement reporting to the board? 
 
Posted @ Wednesday, June 08, 2011 6:26 AM by Catherine
A laudable aspiration that is difficult to do well. As Andrew implies, the time allocated to these internal relationships is often sacrificed in favour of supplier contact, market research or simple cost analysis. 
 
In diverse organisations with multiple stakeholders at all key levels, a commitment to knowing the business(es) and acquiring sufficient expertise in each of the stakeholder's concerns to be able to speak their language requires discipline towards self development and trust in its benefit in defining and driving sourcing projects and supplier management.
Posted @ Thursday, June 09, 2011 3:34 AM by Bob Rodwell
An excellent communication"Hub" look forward to seeing Part 2.
Posted @ Thursday, June 09, 2011 10:26 AM by Sean Clancy
A well articulated point Craig, I think too often that companies operating in silos often forget the primary reason they are in business. This isolated and insular mindset is the very reason why, further to your point Catherine, Procurement has very little value / importance in the eyes of Board members. 
 
We have recently concluded a piece of research (soon to be released) which found that seventy per cent (70%) of organizations place importance on procurement to act as a strategic business partner to the business units, but only 46% say this is happening effectively in their organization – might explain why the level of influence procurement has at board level is considerably less than it should be. 
 
Bob, as you imply, getting the communication piece right is very difficult and to make matters worse, if the business is not interested in hearing what you have to say (per the stat above, failing to understand the importance of what you have to bring to the table) you won’t get particularly far in your quest to be seen as a valued business partner.
Posted @ Friday, June 10, 2011 7:58 AM by Guy Strafford
Right now, our entire org. is being downsized and folks reassigned. I review the promotion/reassignment announcements and send congratulations cards with a note stating 'if you or your new staff need training on procurement related to your new responsibilities, please contact me at____________' and let us know how we can be of service'. Just reaching out, realizing that lots of folks have added or new responsibilities and rather than us all getting frustrated that something isn't being done right, offering help. It's new, but I think it will help improve relationships going forward.
Posted @ Friday, June 17, 2011 5:42 AM by Kathy Hennig
Great post! Ensuring visibility is extremely important and one of the issues addressed at our recent SAPPHIRE NOW conference. It’s important to make sure they have visibility into:  
- Liabilities and cost of capital  
- Sales pipeline and quarterly revenue predictions  
- Product costs and product quality  
- Enterprise spend, contract compliance and the sourcing pipeline
Posted @ Friday, June 24, 2011 3:00 AM by Paige R Leidig
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics