Subscribe via E-mail

Your email:

Contributors

Some of the key contributors to this blog will include (but not limited to):

  • Matthew Eatough, CEO
  • Guy Strafford, Chief Client Officer
  • Tom Lawrence, Chief Communications Officer
  • Vinod (Vinny) Patel, Commercial Director
  • Chris Gayner, Head of Marketing

Posts by category

Connect with us

Proxima Blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Industry Update: Procurement's New Role In Pharmaceuticals

  
  
  
  
Chris Gayner - Proxima

Coming off the back of what was a turbulent year for everyone in the pharmaceutical industry, not only were poor economic conditions forcing everyone to batten the hatches, but new stringent regulatory hurdles and looming patent expiration dates have caused the entire industry to look inwards and either insulate or expand.

AstraZeneca being the first of the big boys to kick off this transition. During 2010, AstraZeneca looked at outdated and ineffective processes – focusing on the Finance and R&D operations. During a recent interview*, David Powell, Senior Director of Global Finance Processes at AstraZeneca stated there was a need for AstraZeneca (along with other pharmaceutical companies) to improve overall productivity in R&D and generally “Money wasted on poor processes could be instead spent on new medicines or be returned to our shareholders.  For too long now pharmaceutical companies have been a bit of a ‘back water’ when it comes to efficiency and effectiveness and we need to catch-up. Overhauling and modernising business practices ensures that the company focuses on maximising the amount of resources that we can put on our core reason for being, which is to invent and bring to the market new and innovative medicines.

Powell goes on to discuss the changing role of procurement and the rate at which procurement has moved up everyone’s agenda within AstraZeneca. “Ashley Readshaw, our newly appointed CPO has focused on transforming the approach to procurement, introducing world class procurement practices (such as category management). It is fair to say that a significant amount of savings have been made from these procurement activities.  It is these savings that are helping to transform the way in which we work.

On the other side of the coin, we turn to French conglomerate Sanofi-aventis who in early 2011 acquired German drug maker Genzyme – kicking off what is predicted to be a year of increased merger and acquisition (M&A) activity throughout the Pharma industry.

The acquisition by Sanofi-aventis was primarily driven by the opportunity to curve inefficiencies within Genzyme’s manufacturing operations ensuring that new (and existing) drugs continue to make it to market while boosting sales of it’s high margin ‘orphan’ drugs and strengthening Genzyme’s range of biological medicines.

Over the past 2 years, M&A activity within the Pharma industry has slowed drastically as companies world wide focused on cost cutting and spend reduction exercises in light of a poor performing economy. Now with a glimpse of light beginning to show at the end of the proverbial tunnel, companies are faced with a tough decision: Preserve whatever cash is available until the economy returns to normality (continue returning dividends to shareholders and focus on core offering) or expand into new markets and/or territories, taking advantage of low cost acquisitions (incurring more costs and reducing short term returns).

a) What do you think the right decision is for our friends in Pharmaceuticals?

b) What role does/should procurement have in these strategic decisions?

* Click here to read the complete interview with David Powell, Senior Director of Global Finance Processes at AstraZeneca

Comments

Hi 
 
I don't want to be the one saying what role purchasing in the pharmaceuticals industry SHOULD play. I simply think that it is crucial that not only purchasing is involved in the decision taking/making process, but also the most relevant stake holders. IMO it is better if the fincal decision is taken a couple of months later and considers all value adding input from the relevant stake holders, rather than taking a quick decision based almost 100% on purchasing input, thinking it will lead to the desired efficiency gains -- because in most cases I would bet it won't lead to the desired effects. Cost savings by itself is not equal to efficiency gains. 
 
Regards, 
David
Posted @ Monday, April 11, 2011 6:50 AM by David
Outsourcing and procurement can play a major part on whether Pharmaceuticals (or any other company)are able to get back on track and enjoy the higher returns that they were experiencing in the past.
Posted @ Monday, April 11, 2011 4:38 PM by Jim Clawson
I worked in Eli Lilly Procurement R&D for 4 years. Pharma or other industries you need diversification, not only in targeted diseases, but in growth countries who can pay for the drugs and in other product lines (I.e. Devices, consumer goods, generics, animal, etc). Very difficult to move needle in Pharma today, they are all mostly in decline and stock values have lost massive value and have no where to go but likely down. I would drastically reduce all internal R&D, outsource as much as possible to lower fixed costs, buy late stage drugs, and focus mainly on diversified product lines to show long-term growth. Internal R&D is like playing the lottery. Smart people, but takes literally a decade and then FDA, not to mention competitors drugs. 
 
The more Pharma outsources what used to be internal functions the more key procurement to negotiate deals and manage relationships. Pharma needs to move more to automotive model and outsource spreading risk and capital to good supplier partners. The hard part is Pharma procurement is not as sophisticated as automotive in managing supplier relationships, auditing quality, managing crisis issues, etc. Pharma should focus on strengths like drug approval, sales and marketing. Outsource majorIty of the rest.
Posted @ Tuesday, April 12, 2011 3:41 AM by Chad Suhr
The lifeblood of pharma is new products and one of the reasons that shareholders have been more growth oriented (vs. value). You can not save cash for a rainy day as the revenue streams are limited due to patent lifetimes and the FDA approval requirements and the % of products getting to market over the products invented is very small. The clock is always ticking toward patent expiration and new products take time. 
 
As a result the cost cutting is more about reducing the burn rate so that the money spent on research and business development can continue. Some pharma have also upped dividends as a way to retain shareholders while they refill their pipe line. 
 
Global pharma sourcing teams are focused on optimizing costs on all indirect spend. The role in indirect is two sided: working with operational stakeholders to deliver the essential requirements and using the strategic sourcing process to get market competitive pricing and contracts; and working with finance to get a purchase to pay process in place that controls spending and demand management through work flow approvals. Procurement also has a role to find much more innovation in the supply chain (from research throught production) on the direct side to improve research productivity, speed to market and production efficiency. The recent activity with CROs is an example of the strategic role procurement is playing. 
 
Where pharma companies don't have procurement playing those roles there is significant opportunity at all levels - whether small, mid or large cap companies, to play this more strategic role.
Posted @ Friday, August 12, 2011 12:12 PM by Frank Callaghan
I concur with the basic assessment that Frank has offered. However, procurement is not the Lone Ranger in this process of optimizing costs. The entire supply chain must be reviewed along with the strategic nature of the supply base in order to determine how and where to systemically change the dynamics in order to reduce the supply chain costs - wherever they fall. Many of these improvements may be within the suppliers cost structure that can be substantially impacted by the actions of the customer involved. This requires a very different approach than the traditional cost out effort.
Posted @ Friday, August 12, 2011 12:13 PM by John Campi
John, Agreed. The 'find more innovation' comment was meant to be more inclusive and not a procurement only role. However, procurement can and probably should facilitate the discussion so that all stakeholders, internal or external (suppliers or customers, as appropriate), can bring their perspectives and creativity to the effort.
Posted @ Friday, August 12, 2011 12:14 PM by Frank Callaghan
Good points re the role of Procurement in driving the strategic agenda of Pharmaceutical companies. However, most large Pharma have had significant strategic sourcing efforts (across most categories, including indirect categories) under way for many years and there is only so much juice you can get from squeezing the lemon over and over. There are other tools in the Procurement tool box that need to be used -- supplier management, demand management, etc but increasingly forward thinking Procurement groups need to look to add value by contributing to growth, on the revenue side. Both John and Frank alluded to some of those efforts but they need to be ramped up and Procurement needs to be staffed up (with the people with the right skills) to be able to support growth initiatives -- driving partnerships and alliances, supporting outsourcing efforts, providing access to decision makers in countries without a large commercial presence, training staff in negotiations, etc.
Posted @ Friday, August 12, 2011 12:16 PM by Michael Eckstut
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics