Subscribe via E-mail

Your email:

Contributors

Some of the key contributors to this blog will include (but not limited to):

  • Matthew Eatough, CEO
  • Guy Strafford, Chief Client Officer
  • Tom Lawrence, Chief Communications Officer
  • Vinod (Vinny) Patel, Commercial Director
  • Chris Gayner, Head of Marketing

Posts by category

Connect with us

Proxima Blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Time to give SMEs a chance?

  
  
  
  
Tom Lawrence - Proxima

Prime Minister David Cameron recently promised to increase the government’s network of suppliers from the SME community. So what are the possible benefits and drawbacks of this new approach?

Working with SMEs, as opposed to larger companies, can certainly have its advantages.

Smaller companies tend to place greater value on your business because it often represents a higher percentage of their revenue. SMEs, more so than larger firms, cannot afford to lose their clients and so often commit their best people to the job to ensure client satisfaction. Conversely, it’s not unheard of for bigger firms to assign more junior team members to client accounts, meaning that those working on your behalf could bring less experience to the table than you might expect.

SMEs are often more agile than larger firms, making them better able to adapt to their clients’ processes. SME’s can often develop their service portfolio according to their client needs, which is obviously of benefit to both organisations. Their flexibility and willingness to create bespoke solutions, rather than replicating existing models, is another notable strength and is only possible because of the smaller client portfolios that they manage. Perhaps one of their most attractive qualities however, and one that will surely appeal to government procurers, is the price of this service. Always trying to gain competitive advantage, SMEs will often go above and beyond what’s in the contract to keep the customer happy.

On the other side of the coin, SMEs, because of their size, are potentially new to the market, so they may have a narrower network of contacts and suppliers, and may be less experienced. With experience comes the ability to manage risk, and smaller organisations, when under pressure, may fall short, forcing clients to have to go back to the market to source a new supplier.

The size of the company may also determine the quality and talent of the team deployed on your account. Smaller budgets equate to smaller salaries in many cases. Scale and access to market is also a fundamental influencer; larger companies can usually leverage economies of scale to pass real savings on to the client.

Ultimately, the new approach outlined by the prime minister represents an opportunity for the government to take control of its procurement and manage its supply chain in a more effective and transparent way.

It also creates a real opportunity for a wider array of British businesses to prove themselves at government level, which will no doubt make for a more competitive marketplace and improved quality of service.

For this reason, when looking at suppliers, organisations should judge firms on a case-by-case basis, carefully scrutinising the merits of their offering, rather than just their size, in order to maximise the quality and effectiveness of their investment.

Comments

SMEs are also more than likely to be locally, or at least UK, owned businesses. So by encouraging the use of SMEs, there is a knock-on positive effect for UK plc.
Posted @ Thursday, April 07, 2011 5:51 AM by Chris Gayner
There is nothing wrong with using SMEs if (and it is a big if) they have the breadth, resource and scope to do the job. 
They are great for local projects if the contract does not swamp them at a cost to themselves and other customers. 
 
If on the other hand you give a small supplier a national contract then in my opinion you are taking a huge gamble with public money just to fulfil an SME policy. 
I always remember a hotel who offered such a great rate they became preferred. Only trouble is they had less than 20 rooms and the government had over 100 people a night!
Posted @ Thursday, April 07, 2011 5:52 AM by Mike Platt
Just what is the current Government going to do to help SME’s and I mean SMALL do to get into the public sector procurement arena. It seems to me, that unless You can afford to put on a sponsored dinner and host 400 Council CEO’s for a coule of hundered pounds a head, then you have very little chance of breaking the mould and getting into OJEU procurement. SME’s will get this country back into profit after the bigger ones screwed it up – So where Chancellor is the help coming from in the form of a level playing field for SME’s to get and WIN public sector business.
Posted @ Thursday, April 07, 2011 5:52 AM by Geoff Buckingham
On another but related point – Just why is there such a charge of subscriptions to OJEU procurement services. Just how are the SME’s ever going to be able to compete and offer their seervices and solutions whilst there are such high charges. I subscribed to the supply.gove site for FREE but if you look at the poor level of opportunities they provided – it wasnt even worth opening the e-mail. I have now unsubscribed
Posted @ Thursday, April 07, 2011 5:52 AM by Geoff Buckingham
In response to Mike Platt, I would like to say Mike, that your point of view of the supposed risk of using SME’s is just so typical of the kind of thought process adopted by the larger companies that I can see exactly why this Country’s SME’s struggle to succeed and grow. You know, even ICI, Virgin, and the rest of the endless list of Multi-nationals didnt all start as such, they started small and grew, whether by luck of right time right place with the right solutions, or by that, and good management, they werent born big !!!. Good SME’s are aware of their size, and often because of their size and niche knowledge realise the power of partnering – in todays markets no one single company can deliver a complete end to end solution in most cases. If you know of any please tell me !!. This Country needs a successful SME market of companies to grow – it should be given every support it can by other companies whou could adopt or support them in partnership woking, or by Government in realising the niche and often specialist services they can bring, and by the Banks -( who were never short in taking our money to bail themselves out of the terrible mess they got this Country into,) lending to SME’s and the Government setting funding to develop SME’s.
Posted @ Thursday, April 07, 2011 5:53 AM by Geoff Buckingham
A drive towards SME’s for no other reason but to increase business with them is a blind strategy and potentially dangerous. So I certainly agree with Tom that the sourcing decision must be on a case by case basis. Also, Mikes point regarding their ability to leverage scale is valid. 
 
What is currently missing is the government providing any real strategic intent behind the SME policy. To do this they must define exactly what they wish to achieve by utilising more SME’s so that procurement can develop clear evaluation criteria to distinguish between SME’s and larger suppliers. 
 
They must also help eliminate the many barriers to SME’s supplying the public sector. OJEU and tendering procedures are overly bureaucratic and expensive for SME’s to participate in effectively. 
 
Also the public sector must eliminate meaningless selection criteria which discriminate against SME’s such as “must have been in business for a minimum of 5 years”, “must be ISO accredited”. Such criteria add little value and stifle innovation from SME’s. 
 
Only when we have clear strategic direction as to what objectives the government is targeting can public sector procurement drive real economic value. This goes way beyond the current “best value” mentality.
Posted @ Thursday, April 07, 2011 5:54 AM by Dave Henshall
We have very quickly, and somewhat predicatably, ended up questioning the merits of the OJEU process. 
 
It had much of its foundations in ensuring open, transparent and competitive tendering processes are undertaken to limit risk, stop corruption and ensure the public sector gets good value for money. And it achieves this, in part. 
 
Yet, as MOD procurement has shown recently, it is a system that suppliers and public sector bodies have found ways around. And it actively disencourages a) the use of SMEs, and b) SMEs to participate. The costs and the cumbersome process means that it is simply out of reach for SMEs. 
 
I fear the situation for SMEs will not change, and SMEs will not thrive in the public sector, until the OJEU regulations are reformed.
Posted @ Thursday, April 07, 2011 5:54 AM by Tom Lawrence
I have read the comments with interest. I work for an RSL and regularly use the OJEU process to tender for new build housing contracts. 
 
The process is also lengthly and complicated for Officers as well as suppliers and though it is meant to achieve value for money for the public purse, I’m not sure that it does? I see big firms winning work and sub contracting to much smaller local fims and creaming off any savings that may have been made if we had managed the process differently and brought together different trades at a local level. I’m convinced that this approach would enable SME’s to gain the experience of working directly with an Awarding Authority and could learn from Project Managers like myself what we expect the output to be from a project. Larger firms that have the experience and skills to complete the paperwork dont pass that skill down the line. There effort is put into winning the bid, not delivering the project!
Posted @ Thursday, April 07, 2011 5:55 AM by Joanne Godwin
Returning to the central theme of the blog the government has clearly got itslef embeded in a bit of a dilemma. On the one hand we see the relentless drive for better deals through aggregation (which incidentally is a seriously flawed position to take) and on the other an awakening of “SME consciousness” which seems to think that the EU can be ignored and the rules put in place to safeguard small firms and to encourage open and honest competition can be set aside, which clearly they can’t be. Government efforts should focus on making the process simpler for SME’s by tackling the problem at its route, which is not the EU, but instead the ineffective bureacrats at a local level who hide behind the process and make it as inpenetrable as possible.
Posted @ Thursday, April 07, 2011 5:55 AM by Richard Gibson
There are some processs that can be reviewed to help SMEs: 
 
1. Consider their private sector track record if they have no public sector history. Companies get turned away for the latter 
 
2. Weigh up the risk and financial implications of taking on a local SME rather than going through a protracted and sometimes very expensive procurement process. Large companies can fold as well as SMEs. Additionally private sector organisations seem to manage this risk. 
 
Let's see if the government's thinking goes somewhere or if it it simply hot air.
Posted @ Monday, April 18, 2011 7:49 AM by Juniper Innovations
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics